#60494: "Numerical score for game result (just like BGA already does in Flaming Pyramids)"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. -
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. -
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Cloned from ticket #60385 and #60436
Hi Tisaac,
You keep closing my tickets with unsound arguments. I'm not sure if I'm just not being clear enough.
1) This isn't a "house rule". Game rules apply to what happens while you're playing the game; not to what happens after the game is over. There are already tournament rules for Bang that incorporate some of what I was suggesting (which soimebody else also brought up in a different ticket).
2) BGA is already doing the same thing in Flaming Pyramids. I don't know why you keep ignoring this.
From ticket #60436:
"The rulebook defines clearly the set of winners/loosers, so what you describe is a house rule since you create fictional 1st/2nd/3rd places that are NOT defined in the rulebook."
Can you point to a page in the Flaming Pyramids rulebook which supports your argument here? That game defines a single winner, based on who gets rid of their tiles first. BGA doesn't score Flaming Pyramids as 1 winner and 3 equal losers. If that was possible for Flaming Pyramids, why would it be an absurd suggestion for Bang?
3) There appear to be problems with how Bang is scored. The ELO scores don't appear to be a good representation of player skill, due to problems I've already articulated.
Given that Bang just got out of beta, and just became open for Arena play, I would have thought BGA would be more open to hearing about problems that have come up, from the broader community. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
Report history
Again, I am not saying it would be a bad idea, just that I cannot do such a thing without any publisher approval first, so go contact them about that if really you think that matter, but in the meantime this won't happen here.
And no need to create new ticket, you can answer to old ones, even if the status is "rejected".
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
