#45028: "Remove or tooltip the coloured/first-player tokens"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. -
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. -
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here. Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
The physical boardgame needs the tokens on the starting cards to keep track of who's who on the scoring track, and who the first player is. The BGA implementation doesn't have a scoring track, and the first player is tracked in the sidebar.
Would suggest just removing the unnecessary tokens, but if it's important to respect the aesthetic, they could at least have tooltips to say what they are. Every game I've played of Codex Naturalis so far has included a "wait, what's that token?" question from an opponent playing for the first time. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
Report history
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
